| 1 |
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 13:39 -0700, Aaron Kulbe wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 8/22/06, Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Hi all, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Right now both the KDE and Ruby herds (which, informally, I am |
| 6 |
> the *lead* |
| 7 |
> on both) are hurting for people. I don't have the time to |
| 8 |
> work on general |
| 9 |
> maintenance and bugs at the moment, so we need some |
| 10 |
> help. I've sent out a |
| 11 |
> request for help in the GWN a few weeks ago and got a lot of |
| 12 |
> good leads on |
| 13 |
> potential new devs, but unfortunately I don't have the time |
| 14 |
> right now to |
| 15 |
> mentor anyone either. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> If you're able to help in either one of these herds, it would |
| 18 |
> certainly be |
| 19 |
> appreciated. You don't need my permission or anything - just |
| 20 |
> add yourself |
| 21 |
> to the herd and throw a mail out to the alias saying you're |
| 22 |
> joining us. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Caleb, |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I'm going to add myself to the Ruby herd, if I can ever get infra- to |
| 28 |
> get off their asses and put my keys back up on the servers. I had a |
| 29 |
> total data loss in the last couple weeks, and had to rebuild. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> question... gem is the "official" package manager for Ruby. Why do we |
| 32 |
> put Ruby stuff, other than the bare minimums to get Ruby running, in |
| 33 |
> the portage tree? Why not just let gem handle it? |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Cheers, |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Aaron Kulbe |
| 38 |
> superlag@g.o |
| 39 |
Here's a (probably bad) idea, but, how about we do something like the |
| 40 |
way g-cpan does things. It's just an idea, and, I really don't have a |
| 41 |
clue as to how g-cpan actually works. *shrugs* |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives