Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:14:25
Message-Id: 20050502151356.6d9ca385@snowdrop
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager by Michael Haubenwallner
1 On Mon, 02 May 2005 14:22:15 +0200 Michael Haubenwallner
2 <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at> wrote:
3 | Hi ebuild devs,
4 |
5 | Here's a glep draft now for (a part of) the long-term portage-goal
6 | "act as a secondary package manager" ...
7
8 Why did you post this without addressing the problems I pointed out to
9 you previously? Writing something up as a GLEP doesn't magically fix all
10 the holes in it.
11
12 Oh, and by the way, we don't follow FHS.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
16 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
17 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at>