From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager | ||
Date: | Mon, 02 May 2005 14:14:25 | ||
Message-Id: | 20050502151356.6d9ca385@snowdrop | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager by Michael Haubenwallner |
1 | On Mon, 02 May 2005 14:22:15 +0200 Michael Haubenwallner |
2 | <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at> wrote: |
3 | | Hi ebuild devs, |
4 | | |
5 | | Here's a glep draft now for (a part of) the long-term portage-goal |
6 | | "act as a secondary package manager" ... |
7 | |
8 | Why did you post this without addressing the problems I pointed out to |
9 | you previously? Writing something up as a GLEP doesn't magically fix all |
10 | the holes in it. |
11 | |
12 | Oh, and by the way, we don't follow FHS. |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) |
16 | Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
17 | Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager | Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager | Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at> |