| 1 |
On Monday, June 13, 2011 19:09:06 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11-06-2011 20:48, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Saturday, June 11, 2011 16:24:00 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 15:58:43 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>>> So, effectively the QA team lead can appoint the people who elect |
| 6 |
> >>>> him. I'm not at all implying that Diego would abuse his position, |
| 7 |
> >>>> but still I think that this is not a sane situation. |
| 8 |
> >>> |
| 9 |
> >>> it does seem trivial to remove people who disagree with you and thus |
| 10 |
> >>> cement an echo chamber |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Are you talking in a hypothetical future situation, or has this already |
| 13 |
> >> happened? If so, can you point to an example of where Diego's been |
| 14 |
> >> removing people for disagreeing with him, rather than for disagreeing |
| 15 |
> >> with the Council? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > how is disagreeing with a Council decision valid grounds either ? |
| 18 |
> > punting people because they disagree with any group isn't really valid. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It was not about disagreeing with Council but actively going against an |
| 21 |
> approved policy when the team is responsible for enforcing policies in |
| 22 |
> the tree. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> This is why in my proposal for the review of GLEP 48 I added a point |
| 25 |
> stating that acting against established policies would constitute ground |
| 26 |
> to be removed from the team. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
that isnt what Ciaran said, and what you describe no one has shown me doing. |
| 29 |
thus the only logical conclusions that one can draw from this: |
| 30 |
- Diego mistakenly removed me without knowing all the facts |
| 31 |
or |
| 32 |
- i was removed for purely voicing disagreement |
| 33 |
-mike |
Archives