Archives
Archives
| From: | Caleb Tennis <caleb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting one source package into many binaries | ||
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:07:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200506161201.39687.caleb@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] splitting one source package into many binaries by "Rafael Espíndola" |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:50 am, Rafael Espíndola wrote: |
| 2 | > Is this a bad idea or simply not the Gentoo way? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | The idea isn't bad, but the implementation is more work to maintain than it's |
| 5 | probably worth. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | You can, of course, always roll your own ebuild variation and keep it in your |
| 8 | portage overlay directory. Or, alternatively, you can just "rm |
| 9 | -f /usr/qt/3/bin/designer". |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Caleb |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting one source package into many binaries | "Rafael Ávila de Espíndola" <rafael.espindola@×××××.com> |