| 1 |
Dan Armak posted <200505260725.29929.danarmak@g.o>, excerpted |
| 2 |
below, on Thu, 26 May 2005 07:25:21 +0300: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> That's going to kill it everywhere, gcc4 included. The way KDE uses hidden |
| 5 |
> visibility is itself broken - not gcc. Until that's fixed, we're disabling |
| 6 |
> visibility support in kde. (There was a separate bug in gcc itself which got |
| 7 |
> fixed, which may have confused some people...) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Ahh... yes. Distinctive separate bug makes more sense, now. I had only |
| 10 |
known about the gcc bug. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
So the KDE problem... Is that what's causing all those virtual function |
| 13 |
but destructor isn't virtual type warnings whenever I compile a KDE ebuild |
| 14 |
with gcc4? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 18 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 19 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 20 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives