| 1 |
On Thursday 26 May 2005 02:37, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505251748.27667.cryos@g.o>, excerpted |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100: |
| 5 |
> > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that |
| 6 |
> > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the |
| 7 |
> > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least one |
| 8 |
> > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1]. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> [note the cross-posting] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4? |
| 13 |
> I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to |
| 14 |
> that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^( |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's going to kill it everywhere, gcc4 included. The way KDE uses hidden |
| 17 |
visibility is itself broken - not gcc. Until that's fixed, we're disabling |
| 18 |
visibility support in kde. (There was a separate bug in gcc itself which got |
| 19 |
fixed, which may have confused some people...) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Dan Armak |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
| 24 |
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
| 25 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |
Archives