| 1 |
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 08:19:27AM +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5/10/11 4:08 AM, Jim Ramsay wrote: |
| 3 |
> > - Does this tree signing key have to be DSA? Or is RSA okay too? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> No idea, I'd probably just try and see if signing works. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
/me plugs his ears and presses "GO"... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Looks like it works fine! |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > - If I have a key already, should I generate a new subkey just |
| 12 |
> > for manifest signing, make a whole new primary key, or just use |
| 13 |
> > the same key I use to sign my emails? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> See |
| 16 |
> <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_bdc24ba33036ef413e620dc94532e080.xml>, |
| 17 |
> I think no separate key should be needed. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You know, I even remember reading this email, but focused more on |
| 20 |
the SSL Cert recommendation part than immediate answer. Thanks :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Jim Ramsay |
Archives