Archives
Archives
| From: | "Paweł Hajdan | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 May 2011 06:21:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4DC8D8EF.9040602@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits by Jim Ramsay |
||
| 1 | On 5/10/11 4:08 AM, Jim Ramsay wrote: |
| 2 | > - Does this tree signing key have to be DSA? Or is RSA okay too? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | No idea, I'd probably just try and see if signing works. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > - If I have a key already, should I generate a new subkey just |
| 7 | > for manifest signing, make a whole new primary key, or just use |
| 8 | > the same key I use to sign my emails? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | See |
| 11 | <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_bdc24ba33036ef413e620dc94532e080.xml>, |
| 12 | I think no separate key should be needed. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits | Dane Smith <c1pher@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits | Jim Ramsay <lack@g.o> |