1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 05/10/11 02:19, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: |
5 |
> On 5/10/11 4:08 AM, Jim Ramsay wrote: |
6 |
>> - Does this tree signing key have to be DSA? Or is RSA okay too? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> No idea, I'd probably just try and see if signing works. |
9 |
> |
10 |
>> - If I have a key already, should I generate a new subkey just |
11 |
>> for manifest signing, make a whole new primary key, or just use |
12 |
>> the same key I use to sign my emails? |
13 |
> |
14 |
> See |
15 |
> <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_bdc24ba33036ef413e620dc94532e080.xml>, |
16 |
> I think no separate key should be needed. |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
RSA2048 or so is > DSA in my opinion. |
20 |
Just my 2 cents. |
21 |
|
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
- -- |
24 |
Dane Smith (c1pher) |
25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer -- QA / Crypto / Sunrise / x86 |
26 |
RSA Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x0C2E1531&op=index |
27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
29 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
30 |
|
31 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNyTjnAAoJEEsurZwMLhUxzkoP/21ZvCkM08fkO8Glv1r9jWi2 |
32 |
4+UkYALoBWWvTase5BMxuarliZOiEjxHYStJ9wwY3HAt0GPLpa4HS5SJBgb0VAhd |
33 |
k1khQGLY3mufUpKCmYsad85guAeir5OETemx5cfNCuUUsCcBlFotoo4CQsRTDTmq |
34 |
LAMNPTvXXAdrDzek03q0b6pTiBFEl+5hPQNiyY/VdYOR6/Pmd9qGUS0Cwp1FN9BL |
35 |
oayRh2ngCnu+ebd14cGIGw1OSW/9/7HpnDsg/qDiMFE0ViImWQRCzoYifzUj531K |
36 |
OyG/wA90N9H6fmNXf37v7UzFrZwz42W5rgpbErfAwlcank9/4WyCOHXaMR2KmQE+ |
37 |
7SjlFy6gy7w1MHNI+d/pzSbpyRdmBdtJ21UD3WxT+kofVoGJ8TRTIHAdrjx+QECC |
38 |
5JBQDUGzy6b352DHQb2bZcrlESIteeqt6j+XAsMHW/fhaTmXMGq9gDNB+hfdPwYl |
39 |
Uun7ZVr2gUKgpIYXIp+OAvb7VTZlhKQldFtvDuiDYOr/ZdcAk6gGXc252E9N0cHm |
40 |
IQysE1ANAFZ+tDvFcfOt2M/SIxzaReXuwyCgdzfaFzxCP0JMG+KYLTUqRqHi0xLK |
41 |
pNL09gP0DcENRV+9l+x3h1lbZUULoKCnG/jst6n7drW0/m96YJgPvuGodG84hs3Y |
42 |
pQxG4e8XW5Vw6pAlJiir |
43 |
=T+gW |
44 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |