| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 10/16/2013 02:59 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> -- when in doubt -- ask the maintainer. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
We should just require maintainers to document what their slots and |
| 9 |
subslots are for in the ebuild. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 4. You *can not* trust portage's --dynamic-deps anymore. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> This one is fairly important. In the past, we often assumed that |
| 15 |
> portage will 'update' deps from ebuilds automatically. This is no |
| 16 |
> longer correct if sub-slots are used -- since portage simply can't |
| 17 |
> know which sub-slot of the dependency was used to build the |
| 18 |
> package. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
so we should always revbump when introducing subslots? |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXpBtAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzMsoH/0CLsYBCRPk3vChM4tywIdBI |
| 26 |
sIGEzzmvYeQcHqt4yZNfrSDZF1ACxNk3mrJsyW3E4NLVXU8m13FKh26yPyxpLXiX |
| 27 |
BHZJ/+Yb4aiRRBNMY/39tI1MXm1QeVUmuYreVIeS0llpnfOKUFityJUwSKcoda96 |
| 28 |
sDxUcVwSLq+gPExKOpMV3aEc2moVUWWz/VPFaSRiKBDhbw61cfd+Vcg0pRWCmoT3 |
| 29 |
w5h1jPFF7z07RDtoz1dGJ0X3Ss4thd10pO2/bACSvuldgTCKbmcU3m42TWcGn+ya |
| 30 |
ZIyRtOu3QLKZTPuP2N/S1K8A6qR/gqz/OOxKZztxTVvy2DgTuwXYyVhSsXuPJ1c= |
| 31 |
=bF2i |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives