| 1 |
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento <pesa@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>>> qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and |
| 6 |
>>> trying to run qt-5 on a stable system is already a nightmare with the |
| 7 |
>>> qtchooser switch (in my case I ended up abandoning qt5 as I didn't |
| 8 |
>>> need it that badly). |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I'm not sure how qt5 is relevant to this discussion. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> As I understand it, qt5 cannot be installed side-by-side with the |
| 14 |
> current stable qt4, but it can be installed side-by-side with 4.8.6. |
| 15 |
> My understanding is that this is the result of the same overall |
| 16 |
> ebuild/eclass changes. Therefore, it is another reason to stabilize |
| 17 |
> 4.8.6. You are correct that it has nothing to do with the multilib |
| 18 |
> changes otherwise. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Your understanding is correct, and I agree it is indeed another reason |
| 22 |
to stabilize 4.8.6. Thanks for clarifying. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Davide |
Archives