1 |
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:45:16 +0200 |
2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > And yes, it is *very* unlikely that someone uses a slotted live |
4 |
> > ebuild with two branches being meaningful and managed in the same |
5 |
> > repo. Even if such thing exists, it is broken anyway because you |
6 |
> > can't say that re-fetching the branches back and forth is a correct |
7 |
> > solution. And it breaks existing tools anyway. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> This is done large-scale for all KDE ebuilds (in the KDE overlay) to |
10 |
> support master and KDE/4.x stable branch. Most use git, so no |
11 |
> problem; some (still) use subversion but will be migrated upstream |
12 |
> soon(?). |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Other examples are libreoffice (main tree, git) and cups (main tree, |
15 |
> subversion). |
16 |
|
17 |
I guess that's a pretty comprehensive "we need to do this properly" |
18 |
then. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |