| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Lars Weiler wrote: |
| 5 |
> Your proposal looks like a quick fix for a feature portage |
| 6 |
> can't handle yet. But your attached list of packages which |
| 7 |
> already use that behaviour is already quite long and so you |
| 8 |
> better should convince the portage-devs to include |
| 9 |
> built-use-flags into the dependency calculation. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm currently designing a new dependency resolver and support for |
| 12 |
USE deps [1] is one of the features that it will include. I hope to |
| 13 |
have something usable within the next 1 or 2 months. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Regards, Lars |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> PS: I should add the disclaimer, that I did not ask any of |
| 19 |
> the portage devs before I wrote these lines. I only checked |
| 20 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/index.xml#doc_chap8 |
| 21 |
> and could not find that this feature is already in |
| 22 |
> development. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Now I've added "New dependency resolver" to the list of tasks there, |
| 25 |
along with references to bugs 144480 [2] and 155723 [3] which track |
| 26 |
many of the issues that it will solve. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Zac |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2272 |
| 31 |
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144480 |
| 32 |
[3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155723 |
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iD8DBQFGLPp1/ejvha5XGaMRAg+7AJ9+zn1vl/ysUENJ3atcAKlkVJthqgCg0Mqm |
| 37 |
1pQt6TApdKu9HYIwyvzGekk= |
| 38 |
=YNhB |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives