Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tavis Ormandy <taviso@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fixing the TERM mess
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:52:04
Message-Id: 7C3236ADA8D6B69461A1FF62@[10.0.0.1]
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fixing the TERM mess by Tavis Ormandy
1 --On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:18:42 +0100 Tavis Ormandy
2 <taviso@g.o> wrote:
3
4 >
5 >
6 > --On Monday, August 22, 2005 00:21:16 +0000 Renat Lumpau <rl03@g.o>
7 > wrote:
8 >
9 >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
10 >>> Thanks. The other useful one is to see whether it does 256 colours
11 >>> properly like real xterm does. The following bash script, when run with
12 >>> '256' as its argument, should look the same as it does when run under
13 >>> a real xterm.
14 >>
15 >> Not even close here.
16 >
17 > Your script produces 256 different colours here, the shades dont match
18 > xterm's exactly, but there are definitely 256 distinct colours.
19
20 <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/256-colours-match-xterm.html>
21
22 Ahh, apparently it matches an old version, but they plan to update it.
23
24 Tavis.
25
26 --
27 -------------------------------------
28 taviso@××××××××××××.org | finger me for my gpg key.
29 -------------------------------------------------------
30
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list