Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:47:39
Message-Id: 1172157648.8695.1.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: Re: EAPI spec (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 16:59 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:31:44 +0100 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
3 > wrote:
4 > | Now, I think we could wait even a bit more, but there is much interest
5 > | in seeing it complete so is natural that more people are willing to
6 > | help speeding up at least the first release.
7 >
8 > The question is not whether they are willing, but whether they are
9 > able, and whether throwing more people at it will do anything other
10 > than making it harder to coordinate.
11
12 This I understand. However, your previous comments (and spb's saying
13 he's busy with some other things) has made some people, myself included,
14 wonder if you could possibly use some more help. We aren't talking
15 about forcing you to take on certain people, but rather seeing if you
16 need people, period. We can come to an agreement on who to add, if you
17 require the help. The point being that manpower should not be the
18 limiting factor here in getting this done when there are numerous people
19 who are familiar enough with portage and want to to help.
20
21 --
22 Chris Gianelloni
23 Release Engineering Strategic Lead
24 Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
25 Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
26 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies