Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:53:34
Message-Id: 4DFB69FA.3070607@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/qa: index.xml by Rich Freeman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 17/06/2011 05:25 ??, Rich Freeman wrote:
5 > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
6 >> Not removing old packages does *NOT* violate the policy.
7 >
8 > And this is why nobody likes lawyers. :)
9 >
10 Rich,
11
12 That's a bit controversial. Do not expect developers to use common sense
13 when you frame them with policies that you (not you in particular)
14 established just because you think that they don't have common sense.
15 See the irony? :)
16
17 - --
18 Regards,
19 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJN+2n6AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCdigP/2lUqGrTRsMKSnVzXfrgPVP0
24 fq+n3iTlHkYo6dPHHE8qCp0XeALTwelM/aBV3EHmtfMhxLDrcL1TZXpLPZ1CcAtY
25 /1p5mkkC6BIbpxwhBkKmTVeqPY8sTTkFMWJItrcwL48U47inBEK9+Lk1rZ6ZWJgh
26 km5b9R8NpB9zY5a28HGl+zrIX+W5LFcQZ9DlIZ8+b/wBn6IbTLSN25mmL7HeaDvL
27 GrSv++1PJGAAp0wBo9RwhrgxfGIi+emDZFxMsLoxDmpZLLpZ3FOK/7q1jYXmUJ+O
28 F3mwMa1U71SG5IKYUVPP9lNgWqdM7bneuGcCtvEva3mx7js5GoAdznjm2CQrA5PS
29 RgV3ZgpV6q8IdmOO7/RfA/i5WNQNdK+0gk09o6uElKn1hCV2cW8lcC2yQe8sHyka
30 02x5JSaTijl39cjhqCysNZfuuzM6RzYsNOxwg56OCyl2ZDS3WgyoPInWlrLr1bpF
31 LMNMeD486o/uD4pvkYp40vkbdy2VInasV7+Tpfj5AmNrXqnUNFumHP6t41QsIB90
32 vtRY7G3nSM1nQxfaw8CPrFDiWaKkZ/adScQg6G3W9P3Bi45ddTWtaEh2YseJZm0w
33 C8V+86j0t+LyFkjiHpORkusZgVoNrWW8Z2gSBAvB4IQDJZmyWA/vGPbVvX+CDc5L
34 bo3sP9fYm2YLwGhj7BOL
35 =6aj1
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----