Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why the FHS can't be followed
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 20:11:06
Message-Id: 200207030210.42348.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why the FHS can't be followed by Luke Ravitch
1 On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 21:06, Luke Ravitch wrote:
2 > Though I'm generally a big supporter, I think the FHS might be wrong
3 > on this one. Gnome and KDE should go under /usr/gnome and /usr/kde.
4 > I do agree that adding an immediate subdirectory of /usr is not
5 > something that should be taken lightly. However, Gnome and KDE are
6 > significantly entrenched as part of Gentoo that they might warrant an
7 > X-like exception.
8
9 FHS says /usr should be read-only. Some people are already providing /usr
10 over network read-only. Just think about all of KDE's global
11 configuration files in /usr/share/config for RedHat and Mandrake;
12 /usr/kde/{2,3}/share/config here. Well perhaps global configs should be
13 served readonly, but on my system they seem to change quite often and
14 there's a mess of them (56 files and 3 directories).
15
16 My guess is it's probably unworkable. Now we're unlikely to convince KDE
17 developers to put these all in an /etc somewhere (my Mandrake box has 78
18 /etc subdirectories already) and I'm quite happy to have the
19 /usr/kde/{2,3,4} for now. However, thinking about the read-only
20 requirement, I'd rather see /opt/kde/{2,3,4}.
21
22 BTW, posting this from the 'drake box due to hard disk crash on the gentoo
23 one.
24 --
25 Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) for i586
26 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ 513MB Kernel: 2.4.18-6mdk-pnr-win4lin
27 KDE: 3.0.1 Qt: 3.0.4 up 5 hours 18 minutes.
28 ~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~