1 |
On Tuesday 02 Jul 2002 21:06, Luke Ravitch wrote: |
2 |
> Though I'm generally a big supporter, I think the FHS might be wrong |
3 |
> on this one. Gnome and KDE should go under /usr/gnome and /usr/kde. |
4 |
> I do agree that adding an immediate subdirectory of /usr is not |
5 |
> something that should be taken lightly. However, Gnome and KDE are |
6 |
> significantly entrenched as part of Gentoo that they might warrant an |
7 |
> X-like exception. |
8 |
|
9 |
FHS says /usr should be read-only. Some people are already providing /usr |
10 |
over network read-only. Just think about all of KDE's global |
11 |
configuration files in /usr/share/config for RedHat and Mandrake; |
12 |
/usr/kde/{2,3}/share/config here. Well perhaps global configs should be |
13 |
served readonly, but on my system they seem to change quite often and |
14 |
there's a mess of them (56 files and 3 directories). |
15 |
|
16 |
My guess is it's probably unworkable. Now we're unlikely to convince KDE |
17 |
developers to put these all in an /etc somewhere (my Mandrake box has 78 |
18 |
/etc subdirectories already) and I'm quite happy to have the |
19 |
/usr/kde/{2,3,4} for now. However, thinking about the read-only |
20 |
requirement, I'd rather see /opt/kde/{2,3,4}. |
21 |
|
22 |
BTW, posting this from the 'drake box due to hard disk crash on the gentoo |
23 |
one. |
24 |
-- |
25 |
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Bluebird) for i586 |
26 |
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1600+ 513MB Kernel: 2.4.18-6mdk-pnr-win4lin |
27 |
KDE: 3.0.1 Qt: 3.0.4 up 5 hours 18 minutes. |
28 |
~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~ |