Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Voting on adding Leechcraft to the tree
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:52:31
Message-Id: CAJaTeTqG=O11CArekt7WknfFvDtDgLW5WTnsVykRo1MwxPSLWA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Voting on adding Leechcraft to the tree by Georg Rudoy <0xd34df00d@gmail.com>
1 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:10, Georg Rudoy wrote:
2 > Seems like the only issue that needs clarification now is the number
3 > of packages and the need in separate eclass. Actually, there are 32
4 > ebuilds for now (and new will be added as new modules are written),
5 > and the eclass contains some common procedures for them.
6
7 sounds reasonable then for an eclass
8
9 > seems like he was a bit pessimistic regarding the popularity, but
10 > that's rather unimportant issue, according to Gentoo's policies.
11
12 we're a pretty free wheelin' bunch. maintain your stuff and dont
13 break other people and you should be good to go.
14 -mike