| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 27.01.2017 kell 13:16, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: |
| 2 |
> If anything, I think this is a suggestion that *maybe* we should a |
| 3 |
> > way to |
| 4 |
> > specify a mechanism for allowing a default to be chosen from a |
| 5 |
> > mutually |
| 6 |
> > exclusive set, and then: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Sure, I have some thoughts for this and a rough draft, at least in my |
| 9 |
> head :) |
| 10 |
> I don't have it as a priority to sketch it out well alone, but if |
| 11 |
> someone is honestly interested, I could braindump my ideas in |
| 12 |
> realtime |
| 13 |
> medium. Or someone thinks of them themselves :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I wrote a bit about it in my USE_EXPAND=gui proposal. |
| 16 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/cc39dfafcb33ac0d345c26c0 |
| 17 |
475723b8 |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That's the copy of my piratepad draft on the subject. In the end |
| 20 |
there's a section on it under future ideas. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The initial thread start was |
| 23 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a2de58fcbf9f214362cd5fdb5f67e6b2 |
| 24 |
These were the only 2 e-mails in that thread, everyone was busy |
| 25 |
bikeshedding my USE=gui proposal at |
| 26 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/eecad370248118c474a0d819fa7f3576 |
| 27 |
with some of the multi-choice aspects coming up there. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Any future complaints by QA or otherwise about versioned gtk USE flags |
| 30 |
and whatnot get pointed to these, to pick up and actually go forward |
| 31 |
with this, not just complain. Anyhow, that's off-topic for the |
| 32 |
REQUIRED_USE stuff here. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Mart |
Archives