| 1 |
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:32:01 -0500 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Sure, I can think of reasons why I would want chromium with -cups, but |
| 5 |
> the whole point is to target the TYPICAL user. And the context here |
| 6 |
> is servers - how many servers would have chromium installed with |
| 7 |
> -cups? If anything I'd expect more servers to have CUPS installed |
| 8 |
> than chromium in the first place. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Sorry, I thought the point was to make the base profile “sane but |
| 11 |
minimal”, not to make it server-specific. In that case USE=cups might |
| 12 |
make sense. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Chris |
Archives