| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 29/11/12 09:56 AM, justin wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Standard autotools based packages always use |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> --with-blas= |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> so it is pretty simple for us to make it to |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> --with-blas="$(pkg-config --libs blas)" |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> same thing goes for cmake and |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> -DBLAS_LIBRARIES="$(pkg-config --libs blas)" |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> This game has been played since ever, because blas/lapack are |
| 19 |
> bundled in more then 80% of the packages using it. So we are used |
| 20 |
> to patch them to use system libs. So why not making our lives |
| 21 |
> easier by having a pkg-config option? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> justin |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
..ok remind me again what the .pc files provide you? this is so that |
| 27 |
you can have slotted blas providers and various packages can choose |
| 28 |
their preferred one instead of having to use the eselected one? or... |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlC3hIEACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCXRAEAs1mM8q5Ue+eRddq1gdcMM8Zq |
| 37 |
uvMM0qZmGcVQ/QAt/sEA/1NIn/SDAycCq70U4ZlAlIJ/YKL2jLT04Q1YCLQwyZKx |
| 38 |
=GseU |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives