| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> I don't see anything wrong with how it was proposed originally using |
| 3 |
> contact=0 |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
The reason why "contact" isn't perfect was given by Mart leio Raudsepp yet, |
| 6 |
namely: |
| 7 |
> contact=0 in metadata.xml in this context means that the automatic |
| 8 |
> reassigning should not assign to that maintainer, but when a user looks |
| 9 |
> whom to ask specific questions from and sees contact=0 he/she will |
| 10 |
> understand he/she is not to contact that person as the value is zero, |
| 11 |
> but Daniel wants them to contact precisely him in that case. |
| 12 |
> A different keyword might be better for that reason. |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives