| 1 |
On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:14:53 +0200 |
| 2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> This should not be a side note IMHO. If that profile is in the tree, |
| 5 |
> who in Gentoo will support it? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I will. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Does the Gentoo Project not support the |
| 10 |
> entire tree all of a sudden? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
There are plenty of ebuilds in the tree marked as unsupported by |
| 13 |
gentoo. Probably some profiles too, though I can't name them for |
| 14 |
certain off the top of my head. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> 1) Is bugsy ready for this, with appropriate categories in place? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paludis-related bugs can be marked as invalid and the user directed to |
| 19 |
Paludis' bug tracker on berlios.de. Alternatively, if our friendly |
| 20 |
Bugzilla admins want to create categories I won't complain. I don't see |
| 21 |
a need for it though. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> 2) Is there an alias addy for Paludis related issues, so that Paludis |
| 24 |
> users can communicate with members of some Paludis profile team for |
| 25 |
> support? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
For issues related to Gentoo packaging of paludis, bugs can be filed |
| 28 |
to the ebuild maintainer listed in metadata.xml. For other |
| 29 |
paludis-related issues, there are mailing lists mentioned on the web |
| 30 |
site. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> 3) Is documentation support in place to refer Paludis profile users to |
| 33 |
> when they fail to understand "reason" and demand Gentoo support for |
| 34 |
> issues with the Paludis profile? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
http://paludis.berlios.de/ |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives