1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Kumba wrote: |
5 |
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: |
6 |
>> We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose. |
7 |
>> While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that |
8 |
>> people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-politics or |
9 |
>> else.." |
10 |
>> for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failing to use logic in your |
11 |
>> technical discussion or else..." with power to temporarily ban people |
12 |
>> for non-compliance could be a useful thing. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> IMHO, any enforcement needs to come from the developer community |
16 |
> themselves. We have to be careful when designating small groups of |
17 |
> people with power, because the dark side of power is that can can be |
18 |
> misused. The model of developers collectively enforcing works well |
19 |
> already: the Portage Tree. While we've had small mishaps here and |
20 |
> there, largely, the honesty system used on the tree has worked quite |
21 |
> well. I think that can easily extend to keeping -dev technical in |
22 |
> nature only. After all, it already works for the wayward users who |
23 |
> posts a -user question to -dev. Just a simple, courteous note that such |
24 |
> a question is better asked on -user, and off they go. Nothing precludes |
25 |
> the same response for a fellow developer posting a non-technical mail |
26 |
> into -dev. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> But anyways, we've got unanimous support so far, so next up: What to |
29 |
> call it. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> My two choices are gentoo-politics or gentoo-project. After looking at |
32 |
> debian-project a bit, I think there's no harm in recycling the same |
33 |
> moniker[1] for our use as well. Amusingly enough, there's even a thread |
34 |
> on their ML today about discussion of of-topic topics. The rest of the |
35 |
> content there seems to be right in line with what's been on here too as |
36 |
> of late. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> So, what should we call it? Vote on this! I think the current popular |
39 |
> names are the following (in no particular order, just what I've already |
40 |
> seen suggested): |
41 |
> |
42 |
> gentoo-politics |
43 |
> gentoo-circuits |
44 |
> gentoo-soap |
45 |
> gentoo-project |
46 |
> gentoo-gossip |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/ |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> --Kumba |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
gentoo-project++ |
56 |
|
57 |
- -- |
58 |
|
59 |
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" |
60 |
Gentoo Linux |
61 |
|
62 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
63 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) |
64 |
|
65 |
iD8DBQFGaYa6aTNpke9pJcURAgWwAKCArUbjNjofH4J5lD/8LBTTRHiIUQCfTkyy |
66 |
vygwEFjO9UlYh7xf2jwuiUs= |
67 |
=wsE2 |
68 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
69 |
-- |
70 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |