| 1 |
Peter wrote: |
| 2 |
> Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this |
| 3 |
> concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Please see Message-ID: <43AD1205.1050403@××××××××××.net> (for those |
| 6 |
using MUAs that suck, it's "Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:16:53 -0600", |
| 7 |
"From: Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>" in this thread). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> If you are against meta ebuilds, what is your opinion on KDE? Instead on 9 |
| 10 |
> (or so) packages, there are now over 250! Are 250 separate ebuilds better? |
| 11 |
> I cannot think of another distro that slices up KDE that way. Meta |
| 12 |
> ebuilds at least allow the user the ability to opt out of trying to |
| 13 |
> decide which ebuilds to emerge! |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You seem to be confused by split ebuilds and meta ebuilds. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers, |
| 18 |
-jkt |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives