| 1 |
Am Dienstag 13 Januar 2015, 07:54:16 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 18:48:41 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:44:46 +0100 |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Shor's would be effective against discrete logs (including ECC) as |
| 7 |
> > > well, so wouldn't be applicable to this selection. For post-quantum |
| 8 |
> > > asymmetric crypto we'd likely need e.g a lattice based primitive. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > We're not post-quantum, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Are you sure? The simplest Shor's factorisation machine was already |
| 13 |
> built and published in open press: |
| 14 |
> http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112176 |
| 15 |
> This was done 14(!!) years ago. I don't doubt there was a |
| 16 |
> significant progress in this field thereafter. But it is likely |
| 17 |
> that results are classified. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Lieven's paper 2001 was a milestone but the technology in this case |
| 20 |
fundamentally didn't scale. So, while there certainly have been advances, they |
| 21 |
aren't directly based on it, but on completely different experimental |
| 22 |
approaches. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~martinisgroup/ |
| 25 |
If there's any place to look for technological advances, then ^ here. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
(No, not d-wave either. IMHO.) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Dr. Andreas K. Huettel |
| 31 |
Institute for Experimental and Applied Physics |
| 32 |
University of Regensburg |
| 33 |
D-93040 Regensburg |
| 34 |
Germany |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
tel. +49 151 241 67748 (mobile) |
| 37 |
e-mail andreas.huettel@××.de |
| 38 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
| 39 |
http://www.physik.uni-r.de/forschung/huettel/ |
Archives