Archives
Archives
| From: | Antoni Grzymala <awaria@××××××××××.pl> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits | ||
| Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:10:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110325000931.GA21942@lemongrass.antoszka.pl | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by Jeroen Roovers |
||
| 1 | Jeroen Roovers dixit (2011-03-25, 00:50): |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:59:45 -0400 |
| 4 | > Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned |
| 7 | > > Manifest's anymore ? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Funny that. I only started doing that Yesterday. It had been on my TODO |
| 10 | > for a couple of years. :) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Does that get us any closer to GLEPs 57, 58, 59 (or generally |
| 13 | approaching the tree-signing/verifying group of problems)? |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Regards, |
| 16 | |
| 17 | -- |
| 18 | [a] |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |