Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:19:10
Message-Id: AANLkTikHtND=ttd8afj2yBW3pbkqVcfhwnMXiHsFPvBV@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by Antoni Grzymala
1 On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
2 > Jeroen Roovers dixit (2011-03-25, 00:50):
3 >> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:59:45 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
4 >> > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
5 >> > Manifest's anymore ?
6 >>
7 >> Funny that. I only started doing that Yesterday. It had been on my TODO
8 >> for a couple of years. :)
9 >
10 > Does that get us any closer to GLEPs 57, 58, 59 (or generally
11 > approaching the tree-signing/verifying group of problems)?
12
13 yes
14 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net>