1 |
On Friday 02 September 2005 06:28, Lance Albertson wrote: |
2 |
> Grant Goodyear wrote: |
3 |
> > Christian Parpart wrote: [Thu Sep 01 2005, 05:45:43PM CDT] |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> >>This just leads me to assume you're not really a coder (wrt native |
6 |
> >>programming languages like C/C++), are you? |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > *Grin* This sort of condescending attitude is rarely wise when it comes |
9 |
> > to dealing with Gentoo devs. Not only does it tend to annoy people |
10 |
> > (yes, I'm a tad annoyed by the presumption), but since you're still |
11 |
> > relatively new here the odds are that people know the person you're |
12 |
> > being condescending to better than they know you, and thus it just makes |
13 |
> > you look bad if you're wrong. Feel free to ask people what I do for a |
14 |
> > living, and whether they suspect that I know the difference between a |
15 |
> > 64-bit pointer and a 32-bit int. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Ha! Yeah ... kids these days... just don't respect their elders like |
18 |
> they should ;-). I have seen more and more 'newish' devs speaking their |
19 |
> minds like this without even knowing/asking the person. I guess respect |
20 |
> and tactfulness isn't being taught anymore... |
21 |
> |
22 |
> And yes, Grant definitely knows the difference :-) |
23 |
|
24 |
Maybe I do not understand the diffference between "I assume" and "I know", and |
25 |
"I know" I meant the first, however, in that case, Grant, I do not know why |
26 |
you're requesting this combine when you know about these "issues" already. |
27 |
Don't get me wrong, I am (though, I was) just curious, and really surprised |
28 |
how the hell ppl (telling to be coders) can even think about such merges. It |
29 |
might - of course - *somehow* still be possible, but I just do not believe |
30 |
in, as I posted earlier (by example). |
31 |
|
32 |
And just like kintaco said, there're not only ppl outside that do know why |
33 |
those archs are different, there're also ppl outside that even make use of |
34 |
such things on *their* main arch (x86) and do not care (or did) about 64bit |
35 |
compats, in fact, most do not know that this piece of could would lead into |
36 |
semantic errors on such archs anyway. |
37 |
|
38 |
As said, don't get me wrong, I'm neither new (depends on definition!) nor am I |
39 |
"missing respect". I was just sharing some by-example snippets why this is a |
40 |
bad idea, and I was just "assuming" (not "know") why I said what I said. |
41 |
|
42 |
Regards, |
43 |
Christian Parpart. |