1 |
maillog: 25/04/2005-15:27:12(+0300): Marius Mauch types |
2 |
> Dan Meltzer wrote: |
3 |
> >I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a |
4 |
> >package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one |
5 |
> >package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Actually I'd say the opposite: There is definitely a use for |
8 |
> package-local eclasses, however I don't see the point for category-local |
9 |
> eclasses (especially as that would very funny to get it working). |
10 |
> Example for package-local eclasses? Whenever you define a function in an |
11 |
> ebuild that isn't version specific. |
12 |
|
13 |
Plus, imagine how much stuff will break when you move a package to a new |
14 |
category. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
*> Georgi Georgiev *> Never underestimate the power of human *> |
18 |
<* chutz@×××.net <* stupidity. <* |
19 |
*> +81(90)2877-8845 *> *> |
20 |
-- |
21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |