Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Re[6]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:27:56
Message-Id: 200511231126.05484.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re[6]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation by Jakub Moc
1 On Wednesday 23 November 2005 01:55, Jakub Moc wrote:
2 > > emerge -e world && emerge -e world && emerge depclean
3 >
4 > You've missed revdep-rebuild to fix the borkage that emerge depclean
5 > produced. ;)
6
7 After double rebuilding of the complete world I would seriously doubt it
8 that any stray dependencies were still around. If there were, it would be
9 because of broken ebuilds. That should be reported as bugs and fixed
10 instead of relying on revdep-rebuild.
11
12 About revdep-rebuild, that is an ugly kludge that is only there to
13 aleviate that portage does not record the metadata needed to know what
14 should be rebuilded without having lib files searched. In 99% of the
15 cases it is also not needed to use it, and those people advocating its
16 use should probably put their attention into fixing portage that it
17 records and uses information about what package was used to satisfy what
18 dependency. (and to verify the package tree state after each install)
19
20 Paul
21
22 --
23 Paul de Vrieze
24 Gentoo Developer
25 Mail: pauldv@g.o
26 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

Replies