Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert@×××.li>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:22:53
Message-Id: 401AC0C1.6010701@GMX.li
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher by Jon Portnoy
1 Jon Portnoy wrote:
2
3 >On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:21:57AM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:56:21AM -0500, in
7 >><20040130165621.GA12724@××××××××××××××××××.us>, Jon Portnoy
8 >><avenj@g.o> wrote:
9 >>
10 >>
11 >>>When working with ebuilds, please keep in mind that RDEPEND should
12 >>>contain everything that needs to merge when installing from a tbz2
13 >>>binary package, but that's all -- anything else is cruft. DEPEND should
14 >>>contain everything needed to build and install the package.
15 >>>
16 >>>
17 >>I've had a question about that; this seems a good time to ask. Should
18 >>DEPEND include the run-time DEPs or *only* compile-time DEPs?
19 >>
20 >Only compile-time deps.
21 >
22 >
23 So, where should i put runtime deps when installing from source? If i
24 understood you right, neither RDEPEND nor DEPEND is the right place?
25
26 TiA,
27 Jan
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>