Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert@×××.li>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:20:14
Message-Id: 20040130221351.GA22431@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher by Jan Schubert
1 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:38:25PM +0100, Jan Schubert wrote:
2 > Jon Portnoy wrote:
3 >
4 > >On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:21:57AM -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
5 > >
6 > >
7 > >>On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:56:21AM -0500, in
8 > >><20040130165621.GA12724@××××××××××××××××××.us>, Jon Portnoy
9 > >><avenj@g.o> wrote:
10 > >>
11 > >>
12 > >>>When working with ebuilds, please keep in mind that RDEPEND should
13 > >>>contain everything that needs to merge when installing from a tbz2
14 > >>>binary package, but that's all -- anything else is cruft. DEPEND should
15 > >>>contain everything needed to build and install the package.
16 > >>>
17 > >>>
18 > >>I've had a question about that; this seems a good time to ask. Should
19 > >>DEPEND include the run-time DEPs or *only* compile-time DEPs?
20 > >>
21 > >Only compile-time deps.
22 > >
23 > >
24 > So, where should i put runtime deps when installing from source? If i
25 > understood you right, neither RDEPEND nor DEPEND is the right place?
26 >
27
28 Why would you think that? Runtime deps are always runtime deps. RDEPEND
29 is the right place.
30
31 --
32 Jon Portnoy
33 avenj/irc.freenode.net
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] DEPEND vs. RDEPEND refresher Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert@×××.li>