Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] config_eth0 deprecated - new name?
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:46:41
Message-Id: 20080423204618.GB17988@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] config_eth0 deprecated - new name? by Roy Marples
1 On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 04:21:27PM +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
2 > OK, it seems that hard lines in multipart configs seem to be an issue, so I'm
3 > doing this now.
4 >
5 > For a summary of why we're using hard lines you can read this thread
6 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/45756/focus=45765
7
8 Do you plan to reimplement parsing of the complete ip syntax for
9 addresses and routes?
10
11 See my attached example from work, we use a lot of the various options
12 on stuff.
13
14 --
15 Robin Hugh Johnson
16 Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
17 E-Mail : robbat2@g.o
18 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

Attachments

File name MIME type
conf.d-net-b01 text/plain

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] config_eth0 deprecated - new name? Roy Marples <roy@×××××××.name>