| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
>Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>Luis F. Araujo wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>>Nobody is forcing. I think it is better/easier to keep the package |
| 10 |
>>than tracking/adding a lot of dependencies in the ebuilds. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>So you think actually knowing what packages truly depend on is a bad idea? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
No. I just don't see the point to unnecessarily remove a package of |
| 19 |
249.72 KB that might |
| 20 |
be very tricky to find out all of its dependencies and will lead to |
| 21 |
(unnecessarily) ebuild rewriting. |
| 22 |
bc is the kind of application that has been around long time enough to |
| 23 |
cause tricky |
| 24 |
problems, that's fine ... as long as it isn't unncessarily. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives