1 |
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:04 +0100, Tom Martin wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 08:17:08AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > If you make the flag global, can you make sure that all of the packages |
4 |
> > that use this flag exhibit the same behavior when using it. If they all |
5 |
> > do their own thing, then I would suggest leaving it local. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Global USE flags are not so much a case of x number of packages use it, |
8 |
> > but x number of package use it to mean the same thing. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I didn't realise that the flag was being used in more than one way -- |
11 |
> how else is it being used? |
12 |
|
13 |
I never said that it was... I just said to make sure to check... ;] |
14 |
|
15 |
Of course, I agree with everyone else that this shouldn't be a USE flag, |
16 |
at all. My personal opinion is that we install the logrotate.d files no |
17 |
matter what, and users can INSTALL_MASK it if they don't want it. After |
18 |
all, is the file installed by default upstream? If so, then why are we |
19 |
hiding it behind a USE flag in the first place? |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
24 |
Games - Developer |
25 |
Gentoo Linux |