| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 14 September 2002 17:10, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Hannes Mehnert wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Hi everyone, |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > I just commited seperate ebuilds for gvim and vim. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I seem to be a lone dissenting voice here, so I'm proably missing |
| 11 |
> something, but is this really a good idea? I've always regarded the |
| 12 |
> split packaging of vim in other distros as an unfortunate consequence of |
| 13 |
> their not being able to handle compile time options. Since one of gentoos |
| 14 |
> strengths is that it can this seems an odd decision - what's the advantage |
| 15 |
> over using the X and gtk USE settings like before? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
One advantage is that another ebuild can depend on kvim or gvim (fex. kvimpart |
| 18 |
needs either of these). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Dan Armak |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
| 23 |
Matan, Israel |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQE9hFdZUI2RQ41fiVERAlE+AJ9sR1xCFKUy0yonT3K+P5WvM2d1ngCcChQG |
| 28 |
0WjBMhPK9FiIFfcixW61grM= |
| 29 |
=IJOi |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives