From: | Ewan Mac Mahon <ecm103@×××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Gentoo-User <gentoo-user@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] splitted ebuilds for vim and gvim | ||
Date: | Sat, 14 Sep 2002 09:10:23 | ||
Message-Id: | Pine.LNX.4.44.0209141505570.24517-100000@kitt.york.ac.uk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] splitted ebuilds for vim and gvim by Hannes Mehnert |
1 | On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Hannes Mehnert wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > Hi everyone, |
4 | > |
5 | > I just commited seperate ebuilds for gvim and vim. |
6 | > |
7 | |
8 | I seem to be a lone dissenting voice here, so I'm proably missing |
9 | something, but is this really a good idea? I've always regarded the |
10 | split packaging of vim in other distros as an unfortunate consequence of |
11 | their not being able to handle compile time options. Since one of gentoos |
12 | strengths is that it can this seems an odd decision - what's the advantage |
13 | over using the X and gtk USE settings like before? |
14 | |
15 | Ewan |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] splitted ebuilds for vim and gvim | William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] splitted ebuilds for vim and gvim | Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] splitted ebuilds for vim and gvim | Magnus Therning <magnus.therning@×××××××.nl> |