Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:12:11
Message-Id: CAEdQ38F7bn3sOLdcPVxv+md_kmVoKLMhwzYofB2b73xuPUHLMQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list by "Michał Górny"
1 On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:55 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > W dniu wto, 09.01.2018 o godzinie 17∶08 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner
3 > napisał:
4 >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
5 >> > During the last Gentoo council meeting, the decision was made to implement
6 >> > changes to the gentoo-dev mailing list [1].
7 >> >
8 >> > These changes affect only the gentoo-dev mailing list, and will come into
9 >> > effect on 23 January 2018.
10 >> >
11 >> > * Subscribing to the list and receiving list mail remains as it is now.
12 >> > * Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo developers and
13 >> > whitelisted additional participants.
14 >> > * Whitelisting requires that one developer vouches for you. We intend this
15 >> > to be as unbureaucratic as possible.
16 >> > * Obviously, repeated off-topic posting as well as behaviour against the
17 >> > Code of Conduct [2] will lead to revocation of the posting permission.
18 >> >
19 >> > If, as a non-developer, you want to participate in a discussion on
20 >> > gentoo-dev,
21 >> > - either reply directly to the author of a list mail and ask him/her to
22 >> > forward your message,
23 >> > - or ask any Gentoo developer of your choice to get you whitelisted.
24 >> >
25 >> > If, as a developer, you want to have someone whitelisted, please comment on
26 >> > bug 644070 [3]. Similar to Bugzilla editbugs permission, if you are vouching
27 >> > for a contributor you are expected to keep an eye on their activity.
28 >>
29 >> It seems like the obvious way this fails is some Gentoo developer acks
30 >> one of the problem people. I don't think that's particularly unlikely.
31 >> Then what do we do?
32 >>
33 >
34 > Then it becomes comrel business.
35
36 If that was an effective solution, wouldn't the problem already be solved?

Replies