Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:58:38
Message-Id: 5444425D.4040601@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11 by Jeroen Roovers
1 On 10/19/14 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
2 > On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 18:53:43 -0400
3 > "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> we may want to inform users about breakage at the ABI level in case
6 >> they do something like add -std=c++11 to their global CXXFLAGS.
7 > You mean tell them they get to keep the pieces?
8 >
9 >
10 > jer
11 >
12
13 Yes. I'm saying it politely.
14
15 --
16 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
17 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
18 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
19 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
20 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: News item regarding c++98 vs c++11 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>