| 1 |
Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> Because, in practice, this doesn't happen. Accounts (or, in this case, |
| 3 |
> email addresses) stay around until someone gets enough of a bee under their |
| 4 |
> bonnet to do somethig about it. Since there's no pain or cost for the |
| 5 |
> AT/HT project lead, there's no reason for them to be vigilant about |
| 6 |
> tracking activity. Plus, assuming we have a large number of these testers, |
| 7 |
> how are people going to know whether or not one specific arch tester is |
| 8 |
> active? That's not an acceptable solution. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Uhm, does that implicitly mean there is such a tracking method for devs (where |
| 11 |
dev = dev/staff/whatever)? There are devs who don't have commit permissions to |
| 12 |
any cvs repo, how is their activity tracked? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In the AT case it wouldn't be so hard to check their activity. !seen on IRC and |
| 15 |
a bugzilla query printing out bugs where they made a comment should be enough, IMHO. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Simon Stelling |
| 19 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead |
| 20 |
blubb@g.o |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives