Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tree signing and verification on the user side - status?
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:10:56
Message-Id: CAKmKYaD4du5+cO1cgYdn+72sbOK+EG8PcHuPo5qXydYP0SdcTA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tree signing and verification on the user side - status? by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
2 <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
3 >> while we're discussing super-strength hash algos, it would be cool to know
4 >> what's still missing for
5 >> * rsync-side manifest signing in whatever way
6 >> * verification of such signatures in portage / emerge
7 >>
8 >
9 > (and just to put it in a reference frame, I'm these days reading mailing list
10 > discussions how cryptographic signing of our rsync tree is urgently needed...
11 > ... in the council agenda threads
12 > ... of the very first council
13 > ... i.e., 2005
14 > ... i.e., roughly 12 years ago.)
15
16 Was thinking exactly the same thing yesterday. How do we make it
17 happen? Do we have any ideas on feasible paths forward?
18
19 Cheers,
20
21 Dirkjan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Tree signing and verification on the user side - status? Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>