| 1 |
On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 3 |
> > No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> No, that means something completely different. It means that you should |
| 6 |
> install the software only if you find both the GPL-2 and the exception |
| 7 |
> acceptable, rather than if you find the combination of the GPL-2 with |
| 8 |
> the exception acceptable. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
And that's why it's not different. Such exceptions usually don't stand for |
| 11 |
themselves, but relate to the license they're bound to. Can be matter of the |
| 12 |
wording, though. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I consider it quite stupid adding extra licenses for such exceptions. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Carsten |
Archives