Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Eigen and GPL-2 exception - is a new licence required?
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 13:40:58
Message-Id: 20070512133820.GA14564@boostbox.mill1.nb.home.nl
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Eigen and GPL-2 exception - is a new licence required? by Carsten Lohrke
1 On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
2 > On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
3 > > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
4 > > > No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices.
5 > >
6 > > No, that means something completely different. It means that you should
7 > > install the software only if you find both the GPL-2 and the exception
8 > > acceptable, rather than if you find the combination of the GPL-2 with
9 > > the exception acceptable.
10 >
11 > And that's why it's not different. Such exceptions usually don't stand for
12 > themselves, but relate to the license they're bound to. Can be matter of the
13 > wording, though.
14
15 Do you need to accept the unmodified GPL-2 for software licensed under
16 the GPL-2 plus exception? No? Then GPL-2 does not belong in LICENSE,
17 unless in a || group.
18
19 > I consider it quite stupid adding extra licenses for such exceptions.
20
21 A generic license could be used, which points to the packages for the
22 exact license.
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies