1 |
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
2 |
> On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
4 |
> > > No. LICENSE="GPL-2 some-exception" suffices. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > No, that means something completely different. It means that you should |
7 |
> > install the software only if you find both the GPL-2 and the exception |
8 |
> > acceptable, rather than if you find the combination of the GPL-2 with |
9 |
> > the exception acceptable. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> And that's why it's not different. Such exceptions usually don't stand for |
12 |
> themselves, but relate to the license they're bound to. Can be matter of the |
13 |
> wording, though. |
14 |
|
15 |
Do you need to accept the unmodified GPL-2 for software licensed under |
16 |
the GPL-2 plus exception? No? Then GPL-2 does not belong in LICENSE, |
17 |
unless in a || group. |
18 |
|
19 |
> I consider it quite stupid adding extra licenses for such exceptions. |
20 |
|
21 |
A generic license could be used, which points to the packages for the |
22 |
exact license. |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |