| 1 |
On Thursday 12 June 2008 08:36:18 Markus Ullmann wrote: |
| 2 |
> After investing more than two hours to just read the Mails that popped |
| 3 |
> up yesterday regarding this stuff, I'd say we can't really take this |
| 4 |
> serious. The PMS maintainers were withholding information on |
| 5 |
> compatibility issues they've seen. |
| 6 |
> As such we can't be sure this will pop up again in the future and so I |
| 7 |
> strongly suggest dismissing this as something official for gentoo. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Ciaran already explained about that, but even if you don't agree with the |
| 10 |
reasoning, that's no reason to shut down a project that will benefit Gentoo |
| 11 |
as a whole. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If you have a problem with the content of PMS, then as I already said, please |
| 14 |
file bugs or send patches. As the history shows, we are willing to change |
| 15 |
Paludis and PMS to match Portage behaviour, when we become aware of any |
| 16 |
discrepancies. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives