Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] some portage related issues
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:19:43
Message-Id: 200404201319.38915.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] some portage related issues by Dan Podeanu
1 On Tuesday 20 April 2004 01:14 pm, Dan Podeanu wrote:
2 > 1. Kernel compilation and gcc
3 >
4 > The recommended gcc version for kernel compile is gcc 2.95.3. Using emerge
5 > to get any of the supported kernel packages should have a dependency set on
6 > 2.95.3 and a message informing the users to use gcc-config to change the
7 > gcc version while compiling the kernel (great tool gcc-config, btw.)
8
9 theres no way this is ever going to happen, end of story.
10 you want gcc-2.x on your system for some reason, emerge it.
11
12 > 2. Compiling gcc 2.95.3 with MAKEOPTS="-j5" (on 4 cpu platforms)
13 > /etc/make.conf fails. However, without using MAKEOPTS gcc compiles fine. My
14 > guess is that gcc simply doesn't like -jX where X is greater than 1, and
15 > should not use it, accordingly.
16
17 file a bug
18
19 > 3. unixODBC and qt
20 >
21 > While bulding a new server from scratch (clean install, from stage1) and
22 > using USE="odbc X", 'emerge unixODBC' fails to compile qt (its marked as a
23 > depdendency) as the qt compilation tries to include sql/sqltypes.h that
24 > will consequently be installed at the end of 'emerge unixODBC' (hence,
25 > things are circular). To workaround it, USE="-odbc X", compile unixODBC,
26 > USE="odbc X", recompile qt (that was built part of unixODBC compile).
27
28 file a bug
29
30 > 4. It would be really nice if we had a tool to automate the detection of
31 > the build architecture (CHOST, -march & -mcpu) based on the info from
32 > /proc/cpu to help the newbie with the installation procedure.
33
34 considering the *large* number of /proc/cpuinfo and the fact that one set does
35 not map properly onto the other set, this is impossible to a degree
36 (-march/-mcpu)
37
38 in terms of CHOST, simply picking the right stage tarball would be enough ...
39 most people shouldnt have to change it
40 -mike
41
42 --
43 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] some portage related issues Dan Podeanu <pdan@×××××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] some portage related issues Dan Podeanu <pdan@×××××××××××.net>