| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>> We already have this with USE_EXPAND. Not exactly the same syntax, but |
| 9 |
>>> I don't see a terrible problem in that, and we don't have to fix all |
| 10 |
>>> three trillion related tools to handle it. Unless you can come up |
| 11 |
>>> with a case that can't be handled with USE_EXPAND. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>> No, USE_EXPAND is only a way to abbreviate use flags with a common substring |
| 14 |
>> in their name, such as "impl_guile impl_sbcl impl_clisp" which could be |
| 15 |
>> encoded interchangeably as either |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> You're kidding, right? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
No, if what I'm saying makes no sense it is ignorance. Please enlighten me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Marijn |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
- -- |
| 24 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project |
| 25 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFHCkNVp/VmCx0OL2wRAv1/AJ9GBpu8wL6NL4Xw8sawwPEeHAmkdQCeJFqF |
| 31 |
fq8NiFnqnV9NBErojijBW+A= |
| 32 |
=LO9y |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives