| 1 |
22.11.2005, 19:03:49, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I keep hearing this, isn't there a real difference between a stage 1 and a |
| 4 |
> stage 3 install inasmuch as somebody who needs (or wants) to dramatically |
| 5 |
> tailor what's in the system profile can choose to do so from a stage 1 or 2, |
| 6 |
> but would have to remove packages after the fact if starting from a stage 3? |
| 7 |
> I wouldn't have a problem with that, as long as we document it, but it just |
| 8 |
> seems that the claim that the old and new methods produce _exactly_ the same |
| 9 |
> results seems to be stretching things a bit. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> -g2boojum- |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Uhm, which reliable tools do we have for removing no-longer needed packages? |
| 14 |
emerge --depclean producing the huge red "I'm broken" warning? Or emerge |
| 15 |
--prune with similar warning in man page? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Hmmm... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
jakub |
Archives