| 1 |
On Monday 26 December 2005 18:07, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Because it makes sense. For any application which has IUSE="emboss", |
| 3 |
> chances are emboss should be enabled. There was a long discussion about |
| 4 |
> this on the -user list a while back where I ended up posting a |
| 5 |
> newbie-friendly explanation of the whole thing. Perhaps you could hunt |
| 6 |
> it down on marc or gmane and post a link here... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Probably you should have provided the link, because the question that comes to |
| 9 |
mind is, why this dependency is optional at all, when it should be enabled |
| 10 |
anyways!? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Carsten |
Archives