| 1 |
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote |
| 2 |
> on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev |
| 3 |
> list to see. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I would like to put forward the following suggestion for the Council's |
| 6 |
consideration: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
"While the current state of PMS is not perfect, it is a reasonably |
| 9 |
close approximation to existing and historical behaviour of EAPI 0. |
| 10 |
Given this, and that getting a perfect definition is not feasible on a |
| 11 |
timescale shorter than several years, it should be treated as a draft |
| 12 |
standard, and any deviations from it found in the gentoo tree or |
| 13 |
package managers should have a bug filed against either the deviator |
| 14 |
or PMS to resolve the differences. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
"On the differences between EAPI 0 and EAPI 1, a much smaller topic, |
| 17 |
it is complete and can stand as a full specification" |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Alternatively, what (specific) changes are required to PMS before such |
| 20 |
a statement can be made? |
Archives